Quantcast
Channel: The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 128

Activist Proxy Slates and Advance Notice Bylaws

$
0
0
Posted by Steven M. Haas, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, on Thursday, September 5, 2019
Editor's Note: Steven M. Haas is partner at Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. This post is based on a Hunton Andrews Kurth memorandum by Mr. Haas, and is part of the Delaware law series; links to other posts in the series are available here.

In a recent bench ruling, the Delaware Court of Chancery enforced an advance notice bylaw and thereby precluded an activist investor from nominating a slate of directors and conducting a proxy contest at a company’s annual meeting.  The court enforced the plain terms of the advance notice bylaw, which required that notice of the nominations had to be given by a stockholder of record. The court found that the activist owned shares only in “street name” on the deadline for giving notice of its nominations, was aware of the bylaw’s requirements, and failed to meet such requirements, and that the corporation was not at fault for the activist’s mistake. The court also refused to give effect to a second notice submitted by the activist promptly after the deadline that had cured its share ownership deficiency.

(more…)


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 128

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>